Changes between Version 8 and Version 9 of docs/CommissioningPlan/P2.2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
01/26/21 16:41:00 (4 years ago)
Author:
kradhakrishnan
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • docs/CommissioningPlan/P2.2

    v8 v9  
    1 == P2.2 Instrument operability and performance ==
     1== P2.2 Instrument operability and functioning ==
    22•       **Phase**               :       2 
    33•       **Status**              :       Draft   
    44•       **Category**            :       Daytime testing (functionality and operability) (C2)                           
    55•       **Recurrence**  :       after instrument installation at telescope platform
    6 •       **Duration**            :       2 days
     6•       **Duration**            :       1 day
    77**Description**
    88•       The functionality and operability of individual components/subsystems are tested. This is followed by the checking of the internal alignment of the instrument using the light source within. The final step is the performance of the system.
    … …  
    1414•       Check the working of all the light sources.
    1515•       Using the on-axis diffraction-limited light source, check the internal alignment of the SHARK-NIR.
    16 •       Finally, the performance of the system is again verified after the installation.
     16•       Finally, the performance of the system is again verified after the installation.??
    1717*      Alignment of the TECCAM (hot pixel)
    1818**Success criteria**
    … …  
    3333MB:I believe checking functionality of motor is included in previous point . However in success criteria is correct what you wrote
    3434
    35 MB: performance checks might require more time than foreseen INCEASED TO 2 days
     35MB: performance checks might require more time than foreseenYOU ARE RIGHT. HERE WE ARE CEHCKING ONLY FUCNTIONALITY or performance???